A presidential memorandum directed the Administrator of the General Services Administration to submit recommendations promoting “classical and traditional” architectural styles for federal buildings. The directive discouraged contemporary architectural designs and called for revisions to federal architecture guidelines. The Society of Architectural Historians argued that the policy would impose rigid aesthetic preferences, disregard local artistic and architectural contexts, stifle design innovation, and limit artistic freedom.

Executive Order 14151, signed January 20, 2025, directed all federal agencies to terminate “all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities,” as well as all “equity-related” grants and contracts within 60 days. The order had implications for arts and culture agencies that receive federal funding, as it required them to review and revise grant programs and compliance requirements. Arts organizations expressed uncertainty over how the order would affect their eligibility for federal funding and which programs might be subject to termination. Executive Order 14151 has been challenged in court on First Amendment grounds, with plaintiffs arguing that its restrictions on DEI-related programs amount to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and suppression of protected speech.

President Trump issued an executive order reforming the federal accreditation process for higher education institutions. The order directed accrediting bodies to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) standards, which the administration characterized as “unlawful discrimination,” and to prioritize “intellectual diversity” among faculty. It instructed the Secretary of Education to investigate and potentially terminate accreditors that require DEI-related practices or who fail to maintain and “intellectually diverse” staff. Academic organizations warned the order could lead to government interference in institutional decision-making at universities, raising concerns about restrictions on cultural programming and curricula, particularly those addressing diversity, race, and gender.